[At the state level:] Under the terms of the [Pennsylvania] commonwealth’s new constitution [of 1776], the right to bear arms joined with militia service was constitutionally guaranteed; the right to bear arms in an individual capacity was a natural and common law right that the legislature could proscribe.
[At the federal level:] The [second] amendment provided that Congress could never deprive people the right to own firearms in the dispatch of their obligation to fulfill militia service. The right to own a gun for individual self-protection was different — a matter of common law that … could be expanded, modified or taken away by legislation.
The court’s majority is cherry-picking its history, grasping for any historical example that props up the end it hopes to achieve.
– Joshua Zeitz, The Supreme Court’s Faux Originalism.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/06/26/conservative-supreme-court-gun-control-00042417